Option 1

Option 2

BK-B (160GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) | BK-B (160GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | MicroBT | Baikal | Contextual |
| Model | M50 | BK | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 128 TH/s Best | 160 GH/s | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3276W | 410W Best | BK-B (160GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 25.59 J/TH | 2.56 J/GH Best | BK-B (160GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 78.6 kWh | 9.8 kWh Best | BK-B (160GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.14 | $0.74 Best | BK-B (160GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$4.12 | $22.19 Best | BK-B (160GH/s) |
| Price | $663.08 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 125 x 425 x 225 mm | 125 x 312 x 130 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 3800 g | Contextual |
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
BK-B (160GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 128 TH/s compared to BK-B (160GH/s)'s 160 GH/s.
BK-B (160GH/s) is more energy efficient at 2.56 J/GH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.