Option 1
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s)
Option 2
BK-N+ (40KH/s)
Balanced match
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) and BK-N+ (40KH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) | BK-N+ (40KH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | MicroBT | Baikal | Contextual |
| Model | M50 | BK | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 128 TH/s Best | 40 KH/s | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3276W | 120W Best | BK-N+ (40KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 25.59 J/TH | 3.00 J/KH Best | BK-N+ (40KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 78.6 kWh | 2.9 kWh Best | BK-N+ (40KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.14 Best | -$0.17 | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$4.12 Best | -$5.18 | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Price | $663.08 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 125 x 425 x 225 mm | 125 x 312 x 130 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 3700 g | Contextual |
Performance
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
BK-N+ (40KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) or BK-N+ (40KH/s)?
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 128 TH/s compared to BK-N+ (40KH/s)'s 40 KH/s.
Is Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) more efficient than BK-N+ (40KH/s)?
BK-N+ (40KH/s) is more energy efficient at 3.00 J/KH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.