Option 1

Option 2

Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. A11 (3.2TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | A11 (3.2TH/s) | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | DragonBall Miner | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | A11 | K7 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 3.2 TH/s | 63.5 TH/s Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2300W Best | 3080W | A11 (3.2TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 718.75 J/TH | 48.50 J/TH Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 55.2 kWh Best | 73.9 kWh | A11 (3.2TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.25 | $1.21 Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$37.56 | $36.44 Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $1,727.88 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | 47 mo | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 360 x 290 x 185 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 14500 g | N/A | Contextual |
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 63.5 TH/s compared to A11 (3.2TH/s)'s 3.2 TH/s.
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) is more energy efficient at 48.50 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.