Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

Option 1
Option 2

A4 Dominator (280MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Teraflux AT2880 (180TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | A4 Dominator (280MH/s) | Teraflux AT2880 (180TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Innosilicon | Terraflux | Contextual |
| Model | A4 | AT | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 280 MH/s | 180 TH/s Best | Teraflux AT2880 (180TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1050W Best | 4680W | A4 Dominator (280MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 3.75 J/MH Best | 26.00 J/TH | A4 Dominator (280MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 25.2 kWh Best | 112.3 kWh | A4 Dominator (280MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.40 Best | -$1.56 | A4 Dominator (280MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$42.06 Best | -$46.78 | A4 Dominator (280MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 260 x 280 x 130 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 9200 g | N/A | Contextual |
Teraflux AT2880 (180TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
A4 Dominator (280MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Teraflux AT2880 (180TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 180 TH/s compared to A4 Dominator (280MH/s)'s 280 MH/s.
Yes, A4 Dominator (280MH/s) is more energy efficient at 3.75 J/MH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.