Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

AE-BOX (37MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer L9 (16GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | AE-BOX (37MH/s) | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | L9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 37 MH/s | 16 GH/s Best | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 360W Best | 3360W | AE-BOX (37MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 9.73 J/MH Best | 210.00 J/GH | AE-BOX (37MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 8.6 kWh Best | 80.6 kWh | AE-BOX (37MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $18,698.74 Best | $1.19 | AE-BOX (37MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $560,962.25 Best | $35.75 | AE-BOX (37MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $2,847.60 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | 79 mo | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 198 x 95 x 150 mm | 195 x 379 x 290 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 2300 g Best | 17000 g | AE-BOX (37MH/s) |
Antminer L9 (16GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
AE-BOX (37MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer L9 (16GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 16 GH/s compared to AE-BOX (37MH/s)'s 37 MH/s.
Yes, AE-BOX (37MH/s) is more energy efficient at 9.73 J/MH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.