Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

AL-BOX II Plus (1TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | AL-BOX II Plus (1TH/s) | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Goldshell | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | AL-BOX | Z9 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 1 TH/s Best | 42 KH/s | AL-BOX II Plus (1TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 480W Best | 970W | AL-BOX II Plus (1TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 480.00 J/TH | 23.10 J/KH Best | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 11.5 kWh Best | 23.3 kWh | AL-BOX II Plus (1TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.54 | $0.57 Best | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$16.24 | $17.20 Best | Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 198 x 87 x 150 mm | 132 x 279 x 226 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 2200 g Best | 4700 g | AL-BOX II Plus (1TH/s) |
AL-BOX II Plus (1TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
AL-BOX II Plus (1TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1 TH/s compared to Antminer Z9 (42KH/s)'s 42 KH/s.
Antminer Z9 (42KH/s) is more energy efficient at 23.10 J/KH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.