ASIC miner comparison

AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) vs Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s)

Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)
VS
Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s)
Higher hashrate
AL-BOX III
Better efficiency
N/A
Estimated net daily
Tie
Hosted power rate
$0.060/kWh

Option 1

AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)

Ask availability
AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
1.25 MH/s
Net daily
$0.00
Open product page

Option 2

Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s)

Ask availability
Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
9.5 KH/s
Net daily
$0.00
Open product page

AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) leads this comparison

AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.

AL-BOX III
2
metric wins
Antminer E11
1
metric wins

Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.

Technical comparison

Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.

FeatureAL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s)Advantage
Brand
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Model
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Hashrate
1.25 MH/s
Best
9.5 KH/s
AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)
Power Consumption
0W
0W
Tie
Efficiency
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Daily energy use
0.0 kWh
0.0 kWh
Tie
Net Daily Profit (Est.)
$0.00
$0.00
Tie
Monthly Profit (Est.)
$0.00
$0.00
Best
Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s)
Price
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Estimated ROI
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Cooling
AIR
AIR
Contextual
Dimensions
198 x 87 x 150 mm
400 x 290 x 195 mm
Contextual
Weight
3800 g
Best
14200 g
AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)

Performance

AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.

Efficiency

Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.

Buying decision

Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful: AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) or Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s)?

AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.25 MH/s compared to Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s)'s 9.5 KH/s.

Is AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) more efficient than Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s)?

Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.

Which miner has the better estimated ROI?

Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.

Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose

Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.