Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) and CK-BOX 2 (2.1TH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) | CK-BOX 2 (2.1TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Goldshell | Contextual |
| Model | B3 | CK | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 780 H/s | 2.1 TH/s Best | CK-BOX 2 (2.1TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 360W Best | 400W | Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) |
| Efficiency | 0.46 J/H Best | 190.48 J/TH | Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) |
| Daily energy use | 8.6 kWh Best | 9.6 kWh | Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$0.52 | -$0.44 Best | CK-BOX 2 (2.1TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$15.55 | -$13.08 Best | CK-BOX 2 (2.1TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 124 x 313 x 155 mm | 178 x 84 x 150 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 2000 g | Contextual |
CK-BOX 2 (2.1TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
CK-BOX 2 (2.1TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 2.1 TH/s compared to Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s)'s 780 H/s.
Yes, Antminer B3 (780Hz) (780H/s) is more energy efficient at 0.46 J/H.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.