Option 1

Option 2
Antminer DR5 (34TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. T3 50T (50TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer DR5 (34TH/s) | T3 50T (50TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Innosilicon | Contextual |
| Model | DR | T3 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 34 TH/s | 50 TH/s Best | T3 50T (50TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1800W Best | 3100W | Antminer DR5 (34TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 52.94 J/TH Best | 62.00 J/TH | Antminer DR5 (34TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 43.2 kWh Best | 74.4 kWh | Antminer DR5 (34TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $127.64 Best | -$2.89 | Antminer DR5 (34TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $3,829.14 Best | -$86.82 | Antminer DR5 (34TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 175 x 238 x 279 mm | 272 x 268 x 203 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 9400 g Best | 10000 g | Antminer DR5 (34TH/s) |
T3 50T (50TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer DR5 (34TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
T3 50T (50TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 50 TH/s compared to Antminer DR5 (34TH/s)'s 34 TH/s.
Yes, Antminer DR5 (34TH/s) is more energy efficient at 52.94 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.