Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Giant+ A2000 (2GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s) | Giant+ A2000 (2GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | Baikal | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | Giant+ | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 9.5 KH/s | 2 GH/s Best | Giant+ A2000 (2GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 0W Best | 450W | Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s) |
| Efficiency | N/A | 225.00 J/GH | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 0.0 kWh Best | 10.8 kWh | Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.00 Best | -$0.64 | Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $0.00 Best | -$19.14 | Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 400 x 290 x 195 mm | 125 x 300 x 140 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 14200 g | 2980 g Best | Giant+ A2000 (2GH/s) |
Giant+ A2000 (2GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Giant+ A2000 (2GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 2 GH/s compared to Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s)'s 9.5 KH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.