Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s) | Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 9.5 KH/s | 1.55 MH/s Best | Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 0W | 0W | Tie |
| Efficiency | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 0.0 kWh | 0.0 kWh | Tie |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.00 | $0.00 | Tie |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $0.00 Best | $0.00 | Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 400 x 290 x 195 mm | 125 x 347 x 160 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 14200 g | 4600 g Best | Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) |
Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.55 MH/s compared to Antminer E11 (9.5KH/s)'s 9.5 KH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.