Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) | AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | E9 | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 2.4 GH/s Best | 1.25 MH/s | Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1920W | 0W Best | AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 800.00 J/GH | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 46.1 kWh | 0.0 kWh Best | AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.46 | $0.00 Best | AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$43.94 | $0.00 Best | AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 195 x 400 x 290 mm | 198 x 87 x 150 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 14200 g | 3800 g Best | AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) |
Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 2.4 GH/s compared to AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)'s 1.25 MH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.