Option 1
Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s)
Option 2
B8 (49TH/s)
Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) leads this comparison
Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. B8 (49TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) | B8 (49TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Bitfury | Contextual |
| Model | E9 | B | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 2.4 GH/s | 49 TH/s Best | B8 (49TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1920W Best | 6400W | Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 800.00 J/GH | 130.61 J/TH Best | B8 (49TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 46.1 kWh Best | 153.6 kWh | Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.46 Best | -$7.63 | Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$43.94 Best | -$228.78 | Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 195 x 400 x 290 mm | 440 x 650 x 270 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 14200 g Best | 37000 g | Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) |
Performance
B8 (49TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
B8 (49TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) or B8 (49TH/s)?
B8 (49TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 49 TH/s compared to Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s)'s 2.4 GH/s.
Is Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) more efficient than B8 (49TH/s)?
B8 (49TH/s) is more energy efficient at 130.61 J/TH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.