ASIC miner comparison

Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) vs CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)

Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s)
VS
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)
Higher hashrate
CK
Better efficiency
CK
Estimated net daily
CK
Hosted power rate
$0.060/kWh

Option 1

Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s)

Ask availability
Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
2.4 GH/s
Net daily
-$1.46
Open product page

Option 2

CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)

Ask availability
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
1.05 TH/s
Net daily
-$0.22
Open product page

CK-BOX (1.05TH/s) leads this comparison

CK-BOX (1.05TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.

E9
0
metric wins
CK
7
metric wins

Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.

Technical comparison

Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.

FeatureAntminer E9 (2.4GH/s)CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)Advantage
Brand
Antminer
Goldshell
Contextual
Model
E9
CK
Contextual
Hashrate
2.4 GH/s
1.05 TH/s
Best
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)
Power Consumption
1920W
215W
Best
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)
Efficiency
800.00 J/GH
204.76 J/TH
Best
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)
Daily energy use
46.1 kWh
5.2 kWh
Best
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)
Net Daily Profit (Est.)
-$1.46
-$0.22
Best
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)
Monthly Profit (Est.)
-$43.94
-$6.59
Best
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)
Price
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Estimated ROI
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Cooling
AIR
AIR
Contextual
Dimensions
195 x 400 x 290 mm
175 x 84 x 150 mm
Contextual
Weight
14200 g
2000 g
Best
CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)

Performance

CK-BOX (1.05TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.

Efficiency

CK-BOX (1.05TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.

Buying decision

Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful: Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) or CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)?

CK-BOX (1.05TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.05 TH/s compared to Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s)'s 2.4 GH/s.

Is Antminer E9 (2.4GH/s) more efficient than CK-BOX (1.05TH/s)?

CK-BOX (1.05TH/s) is more energy efficient at 204.76 J/TH.

Which miner has the better estimated ROI?

Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.

Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose

Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.