Option 1
Antminer HS3 (9TH/s)
Option 2
KD-BOX (1.6TH/s)
KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) leads this comparison
KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) | KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Goldshell | Contextual |
| Model | HS3 | KD | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 9 TH/s Best | 1.6 TH/s | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2079W | 205W Best | KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 231.00 J/TH | 128.13 J/TH Best | KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 49.9 kWh | 4.9 kWh Best | KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.10 | -$0.27 Best | KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$33.11 | -$7.96 Best | KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 331 x 391 x 234 mm | 150 x 85 x 180 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 6100 g | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) or KD-BOX (1.6TH/s)?
Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 9 TH/s compared to KD-BOX (1.6TH/s)'s 1.6 TH/s.
Is Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) more efficient than KD-BOX (1.6TH/s)?
KD-BOX (1.6TH/s) is more energy efficient at 128.13 J/TH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.