Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) and WhatsMiner M79S (1.35PH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) | WhatsMiner M79S (1.35PH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | WhatsMiner | Contextual |
| Model | HS3 | M79 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 9 TH/s | 1.35 PH/s Best | WhatsMiner M79S (1.35PH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2079W Best | 20000W | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 231.00 J/TH Best | 14814.81 J/PH | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 49.9 kWh Best | 480.0 kWh | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.10 | $13.23 Best | WhatsMiner M79S (1.35PH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$33.11 | $396.90 Best | WhatsMiner M79S (1.35PH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | HYDRO | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 331 x 391 x 234 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 6100 g | N/A | Contextual |
WhatsMiner M79S (1.35PH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
WhatsMiner M79S (1.35PH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.35 PH/s compared to Antminer HS3 (9TH/s)'s 9 TH/s.
Yes, Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) is more energy efficient at 231.00 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.