Option 1

Option 2

X16-Q (1.95GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Jasminer | Contextual |
| Model | HS3 | X16 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 9 TH/s Best | 1.95 GH/s | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2079W | 620W Best | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 231.00 J/TH Best | 317.95 J/GH | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 49.9 kWh | 14.9 kWh Best | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.10 | $0.17 Best | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$33.11 | $5.02 Best | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 331 x 391 x 234 mm | 360 x 134 x 482 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 6100 g Best | 10000 g | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 9 TH/s compared to X16-Q (1.95GH/s)'s 1.95 GH/s.
Yes, Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) is more energy efficient at 231.00 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.