ASIC miner comparison

Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) vs X16-Q (1.95GH/s)

Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

Antminer HS3 (9TH/s)
VS
X16-Q (1.95GH/s)
Higher hashrate
HS3
Better efficiency
HS3
Estimated net daily
X16
Hosted power rate
$0.060/kWh

Option 1

Antminer HS3 (9TH/s)

Ask availability
Antminer HS3 (9TH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
9 TH/s
Net daily
-$1.10
Open product page

Option 2

X16-Q (1.95GH/s)

Ask availability
X16-Q (1.95GH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
1.95 GH/s
Net daily
$0.17
Open product page

X16-Q (1.95GH/s) leads this comparison

X16-Q (1.95GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.

HS3
3
metric wins
X16
4
metric wins

Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.

Technical comparison

Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.

FeatureAntminer HS3 (9TH/s)X16-Q (1.95GH/s)Advantage
Brand
Antminer
Jasminer
Contextual
Model
HS3
X16
Contextual
Hashrate
9 TH/s
Best
1.95 GH/s
Antminer HS3 (9TH/s)
Power Consumption
2079W
620W
Best
X16-Q (1.95GH/s)
Efficiency
231.00 J/TH
Best
317.95 J/GH
Antminer HS3 (9TH/s)
Daily energy use
49.9 kWh
14.9 kWh
Best
X16-Q (1.95GH/s)
Net Daily Profit (Est.)
-$1.10
$0.17
Best
X16-Q (1.95GH/s)
Monthly Profit (Est.)
-$33.11
$5.02
Best
X16-Q (1.95GH/s)
Price
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Estimated ROI
N/A
N/A
Contextual
Cooling
AIR
AIR
Contextual
Dimensions
331 x 391 x 234 mm
360 x 134 x 482 mm
Contextual
Weight
6100 g
Best
10000 g
Antminer HS3 (9TH/s)

Performance

Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.

Efficiency

Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.

Buying decision

Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful: Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) or X16-Q (1.95GH/s)?

Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 9 TH/s compared to X16-Q (1.95GH/s)'s 1.95 GH/s.

Is Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) more efficient than X16-Q (1.95GH/s)?

Yes, Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) is more energy efficient at 231.00 J/TH.

Which miner has the better estimated ROI?

Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.

Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose

Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.