Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) and E-AE1M (230MH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) | E-AE1M (230MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | K7 | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 63.5 TH/s Best | 230 MH/s | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3080W | 2000W Best | E-AE1M (230MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 48.50 J/TH | 8.70 J/MH Best | E-AE1M (230MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 73.9 kWh | 48.0 kWh Best | E-AE1M (230MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $1.21 Best | -$0.58 | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $36.44 Best | -$17.40 | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Price | $1,727.88 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 47 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 443 x 135 x 360 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 15150 g | Contextual |
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
E-AE1M (230MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 63.5 TH/s compared to E-AE1M (230MH/s)'s 230 MH/s.
E-AE1M (230MH/s) is more energy efficient at 8.70 J/MH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.