Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.
Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. EPU XC (4.25KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) | EPU XC (4.25KH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | K7 | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 63.5 TH/s Best | 4.25 KH/s | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3080W | 0W Best | EPU XC (4.25KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 48.50 J/TH | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 73.9 kWh | 0.0 kWh Best | EPU XC (4.25KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $1.21 Best | $0.00 | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $36.44 Best | $0.00 | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Price | $1,727.88 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 47 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 612 x 139 x 360 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 28400 g | Contextual |
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 63.5 TH/s compared to EPU XC (4.25KH/s)'s 4.25 KH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.