Option 1
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s)
Option 2
G1 (36H/s)
G1 (36H/s) leads this comparison
G1 (36H/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) | G1 (36H/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | iPollo | Contextual |
| Model | K7 | G1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 63.5 TH/s Best | 36 H/s | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3080W | 2800W Best | G1 (36H/s) |
| Efficiency | 48.50 J/TH Best | 77.78 J/H | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 73.9 kWh | 67.2 kWh Best | G1 (36H/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $1.21 | $8.59 Best | G1 (36H/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $36.44 | $257.64 Best | G1 (36H/s) |
| Price | $1,727.88 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 47 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 158 x 355 x 350 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 19000 g | Contextual |
Performance
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) or G1 (36H/s)?
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 63.5 TH/s compared to G1 (36H/s)'s 36 H/s.
Is Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) more efficient than G1 (36H/s)?
Yes, Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) is more energy efficient at 48.50 J/TH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.