Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) vs Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s)
Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.
Option 1
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s)
Option 2
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s)
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) leads this comparison
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | MicroBT | Contextual |
| Model | K7 | M50 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 63.5 TH/s | 128 TH/s Best | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3080W Best | 3276W | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 48.50 J/TH | 25.59 J/TH Best | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 73.9 kWh Best | 78.6 kWh | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $1.21 Best | -$0.57 | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $36.44 Best | -$17.02 | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Price | $1,727.88 | $637.86 Best | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Estimated ROI | 47 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 125 x 425 x 225 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) or Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s)?
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 128 TH/s compared to Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s)'s 63.5 TH/s.
Is Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) more efficient than Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s)?
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) is more energy efficient at 25.59 J/TH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.