Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

WhatsMiner M70 (240TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) | WhatsMiner M70 (240TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | WhatsMiner | Contextual |
| Model | K7 | M70 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 63.5 TH/s | 240 TH/s Best | WhatsMiner M70 (240TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3080W Best | 3480W | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 48.50 J/TH | 14.50 J/TH Best | WhatsMiner M70 (240TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 73.9 kWh Best | 83.5 kWh | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $1.21 | $3.03 Best | WhatsMiner M70 (240TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $36.44 | $90.86 Best | WhatsMiner M70 (240TH/s) |
| Price | $1,727.88 Best | $2,465.21 | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Estimated ROI | 47 mo | 27 mo Best | WhatsMiner M70 (240TH/s) |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 430 x 226 x 155 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 15000 g | Contextual |
WhatsMiner M70 (240TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
WhatsMiner M70 (240TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
WhatsMiner M70 (240TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 240 TH/s compared to Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s)'s 63.5 TH/s.
WhatsMiner M70 (240TH/s) is more energy efficient at 14.50 J/TH.
WhatsMiner M70 (240TH/s) has the stronger estimated payback period at 27 mo, based on current product pricing and $0.060/kWh hosted electricity.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.