Option 1

Option 2

Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. X16-Q (1.95GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Jasminer | Contextual |
| Model | K7 | X16 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 63.5 TH/s Best | 1.95 GH/s | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3080W | 620W Best | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 48.50 J/TH Best | 317.95 J/GH | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 73.9 kWh | 14.9 kWh Best | X16-Q (1.95GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $1.21 Best | $0.17 | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $36.44 Best | $5.02 | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Price | $1,727.88 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 47 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | N/A | 360 x 134 x 482 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 10000 g | Contextual |
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 63.5 TH/s compared to X16-Q (1.95GH/s)'s 1.95 GH/s.
Yes, Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) is more energy efficient at 48.50 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.