Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) and Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | L3 | K7 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 596 MH/s | 63.5 TH/s Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1050W Best | 3080W | Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 1.76 J/MH Best | 48.50 J/TH | Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 25.2 kWh Best | 73.9 kWh | Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.29 | $1.21 Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$38.76 | $36.44 Best | Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $1,727.88 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | 47 mo | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 188 x 352 x 130 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 4600 g | N/A | Contextual |
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer K7 (63.5TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 63.5 TH/s compared to Antminer L3++ (596MH/s)'s 596 MH/s.
Yes, Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) is more energy efficient at 1.76 J/MH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.