Option 1
Antminer L3++ (596MH/s)
Option 2
KD2 (6TH/s)
KD2 (6TH/s) leads this comparison
KD2 (6TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) | KD2 (6TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Goldshell | Contextual |
| Model | L3 | KD2 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 596 MH/s | 6 TH/s Best | KD2 (6TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1050W | 830W Best | KD2 (6TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 1.76 J/MH Best | 138.33 J/TH | Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 25.2 kWh | 19.9 kWh Best | KD2 (6TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.29 | -$1.09 Best | KD2 (6TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$38.76 | -$32.56 Best | KD2 (6TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 188 x 352 x 130 mm | 200 x 290 x 264 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4600 g Best | 7300 g | Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) |
Performance
KD2 (6TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) or KD2 (6TH/s)?
KD2 (6TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 6 TH/s compared to Antminer L3++ (596MH/s)'s 596 MH/s.
Is Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) more efficient than KD2 (6TH/s)?
Yes, Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) is more energy efficient at 1.76 J/MH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.