Option 1
Antminer L3++ (596MH/s)
Option 2
X5 (850MH/s)
Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) leads this comparison
Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. X5 (850MH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) | X5 (850MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Goldshell | Contextual |
| Model | L3 | X5 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 596 MH/s | 850 MH/s Best | X5 (850MH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1050W Best | 1450W | Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 1.76 J/MH | 1.71 J/MH Best | X5 (850MH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 25.2 kWh Best | 34.8 kWh | Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.29 Best | -$1.77 | Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$38.76 Best | -$53.04 | Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 188 x 352 x 130 mm | 125 x 375 x 190 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4600 g | 4600 g | Tie |
Performance
X5 (850MH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
X5 (850MH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) or X5 (850MH/s)?
X5 (850MH/s) has a higher hashrate of 850 MH/s compared to Antminer L3++ (596MH/s)'s 596 MH/s.
Is Antminer L3++ (596MH/s) more efficient than X5 (850MH/s)?
X5 (850MH/s) is more energy efficient at 1.71 J/MH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.