Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer L7 (9.5GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer L7 (9.5GH/s) | Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | L7 | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 9.5 GH/s Best | 1.55 MH/s | Antminer L7 (9.5GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3425W | 0W Best | Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 360.53 J/GH | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 82.2 kWh | 0.0 kWh Best | Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.57 | $0.00 Best | Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$47.16 | $0.00 Best | Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) |
| Price | $752.58 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 195 x 370 x 290 mm | 125 x 347 x 160 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 15000 g | 4600 g Best | Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s) |
Antminer L7 (9.5GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer L7 (9.5GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 9.5 GH/s compared to Toddminer C1 (1.55MH/s)'s 1.55 MH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.