Option 1

Option 2

A40 (3.3TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer L7 (9.05GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer L7 (9.05GH/s) | A40 (3.3TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Miner | Contextual |
| Model | L7 | A40 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 9.05 GH/s | 3.3 TH/s Best | A40 (3.3TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3425W | 1600W Best | A40 (3.3TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 378.45 J/GH Best | 484.85 J/TH | Antminer L7 (9.05GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 82.2 kWh | 38.4 kWh Best | A40 (3.3TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.76 | -$1.73 Best | A40 (3.3TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$52.86 | -$52.02 Best | A40 (3.3TH/s) |
| Price | $671.22 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 195 x 370 x 290 mm | 360 x 290 x 185 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 15000 g | 14500 g Best | A40 (3.3TH/s) |
A40 (3.3TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer L7 (9.05GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
A40 (3.3TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 3.3 TH/s compared to Antminer L7 (9.05GH/s)'s 9.05 GH/s.
Yes, Antminer L7 (9.05GH/s) is more energy efficient at 378.45 J/GH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.