Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer L9 (16GH/s) and AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) | AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | L9 | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 16 GH/s Best | 1.25 MH/s | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3360W | 0W Best | AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 210.00 J/GH | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 80.6 kWh | 0.0 kWh Best | AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $1.19 Best | $0.00 | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $35.75 Best | $0.00 | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) |
| Price | $2,847.60 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 79 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 195 x 379 x 290 mm | 198 x 87 x 150 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 17000 g | 3800 g Best | AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s) |
Antminer L9 (16GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer L9 (16GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 16 GH/s compared to AL-BOX III (1.25MH/s)'s 1.25 MH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.