Option 1

Option 2

Antminer L9 (16GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. AL3 (15TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) | AL3 (15TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | IceRiver | Contextual |
| Model | L9 | AL | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 16 GH/s | 15 TH/s Best | AL3 (15TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3360W Best | 3500W | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 210.00 J/GH Best | 233.33 J/TH | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 80.6 kWh Best | 84.0 kWh | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $1.19 Best | -$2.47 | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $35.75 Best | -$74.10 | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) |
| Price | $2,847.60 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 79 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 195 x 379 x 290 mm | 370 x 290 x 195 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 17000 g | 16000 g Best | AL3 (15TH/s) |
AL3 (15TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer L9 (16GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
AL3 (15TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 15 TH/s compared to Antminer L9 (16GH/s)'s 16 GH/s.
Yes, Antminer L9 (16GH/s) is more energy efficient at 210.00 J/GH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.