Option 1
Antminer L9 (16GH/s)
Option 2
SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s)
Balanced match
Antminer L9 (16GH/s) and SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) are close enough that your final choice should come down to stock, delivery timing, and hosting preference.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) | SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Obelisk | Contextual |
| Model | L9 | SC1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 16 GH/s | 1.1 TH/s Best | SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3360W | 900W Best | SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 210.00 J/GH Best | 818.18 J/TH | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 80.6 kWh | 21.6 kWh Best | SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $1.19 Best | -$0.96 | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $35.75 Best | -$28.68 | Antminer L9 (16GH/s) |
| Price | $2,847.60 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 79 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 195 x 379 x 290 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 17000 g | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
Antminer L9 (16GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer L9 (16GH/s) or SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s)?
SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 1.1 TH/s compared to Antminer L9 (16GH/s)'s 16 GH/s.
Is Antminer L9 (16GH/s) more efficient than SC1 Dual (1.1TH/s)?
Yes, Antminer L9 (16GH/s) is more energy efficient at 210.00 J/GH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.