Option 1
Antminer L9 (17GH/s)
Option 2
G1 (36H/s)
G1 (36H/s) leads this comparison
G1 (36H/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer L9 (17GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) | G1 (36H/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | iPollo | Contextual |
| Model | L9 | G1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 17 GH/s Best | 36 H/s | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3570W | 2800W Best | G1 (36H/s) |
| Efficiency | 210.00 J/GH | 77.78 J/H Best | G1 (36H/s) |
| Daily energy use | 85.7 kWh | 67.2 kWh Best | G1 (36H/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.85 | $8.59 Best | G1 (36H/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $25.48 | $257.64 Best | G1 (36H/s) |
| Price | $3,152.70 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 122 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 195 x 379 x 290 mm | 158 x 355 x 350 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 17000 g Best | 19000 g | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
Performance
Antminer L9 (17GH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
G1 (36H/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer L9 (17GH/s) or G1 (36H/s)?
Antminer L9 (17GH/s) has a higher hashrate of 17 GH/s compared to G1 (36H/s)'s 36 H/s.
Is Antminer L9 (17GH/s) more efficient than G1 (36H/s)?
G1 (36H/s) is more energy efficient at 77.78 J/H.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.