ASIC miner comparison

Antminer L9 (17GH/s) vs STU-U1++ (52TH/s)

Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.

Antminer L9 (17GH/s)
VS
STU-U1++ (52TH/s)
Higher hashrate
STU
Better efficiency
STU
Estimated net daily
STU
Hosted power rate
$0.060/kWh

Option 1

Antminer L9 (17GH/s)

50 available
Antminer L9 (17GH/s)
Price
$3,152.70
ROI
122 mo
Hashrate
17 GH/s
Net daily
$0.85
Open product page

Option 2

STU-U1++ (52TH/s)

Ask availability
STU-U1++ (52TH/s)
Price
N/A
ROI
N/A
Hashrate
52 TH/s
Net daily
$142.71
Open product page

STU-U1++ (52TH/s) leads this comparison

STU-U1++ (52TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer L9 (17GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.

L9
0
metric wins
STU
7
metric wins

Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.

Technical comparison

Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.

FeatureAntminer L9 (17GH/s)STU-U1++ (52TH/s)Advantage
Brand
Antminer
StrongU
Contextual
Model
L9
STU
Contextual
Hashrate
17 GH/s
52 TH/s
Best
STU-U1++ (52TH/s)
Power Consumption
3570W
2200W
Best
STU-U1++ (52TH/s)
Efficiency
210.00 J/GH
42.31 J/TH
Best
STU-U1++ (52TH/s)
Daily energy use
85.7 kWh
52.8 kWh
Best
STU-U1++ (52TH/s)
Net Daily Profit (Est.)
$0.85
$142.71
Best
STU-U1++ (52TH/s)
Monthly Profit (Est.)
$25.48
$4,281.36
Best
STU-U1++ (52TH/s)
Price
$3,152.70
N/A
Contextual
Estimated ROI
122 mo
N/A
Contextual
Cooling
AIR
AIR
Contextual
Dimensions
195 x 379 x 290 mm
130 x 390 x 220 mm
Contextual
Weight
17000 g
8200 g
Best
STU-U1++ (52TH/s)

Performance

STU-U1++ (52TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.

Efficiency

STU-U1++ (52TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.

Buying decision

Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful: Antminer L9 (17GH/s) or STU-U1++ (52TH/s)?

STU-U1++ (52TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 52 TH/s compared to Antminer L9 (17GH/s)'s 17 GH/s.

Is Antminer L9 (17GH/s) more efficient than STU-U1++ (52TH/s)?

STU-U1++ (52TH/s) is more energy efficient at 42.31 J/TH.

Which miner has the better estimated ROI?

Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.

Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose

Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.