Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.
Option 1
Option 2
STU-U8 Pro (60TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer L9 (17GH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) | STU-U8 Pro (60TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | StrongU | Contextual |
| Model | L9 | STU | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 17 GH/s | 60 TH/s Best | STU-U8 Pro (60TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3570W | 2800W Best | STU-U8 Pro (60TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 210.00 J/GH | 46.67 J/TH Best | STU-U8 Pro (60TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 85.7 kWh | 67.2 kWh Best | STU-U8 Pro (60TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.85 Best | -$2.12 | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $25.48 Best | -$63.66 | Antminer L9 (17GH/s) |
| Price | $3,152.70 | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | 122 mo | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 195 x 379 x 290 mm | 182 x 390 x 220 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 17000 g | 8200 g Best | STU-U8 Pro (60TH/s) |
STU-U8 Pro (60TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
STU-U8 Pro (60TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
STU-U8 Pro (60TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 60 TH/s compared to Antminer L9 (17GH/s)'s 17 GH/s.
STU-U8 Pro (60TH/s) is more energy efficient at 46.67 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.