Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Ebit E9.3 (16MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer R4 (8.7MH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer R4 (8.7MH/s) | Ebit E9.3 (16MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 8.7 MH/s | 16 MH/s Best | Ebit E9.3 (16MH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 0W | 0W | Tie |
| Efficiency | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 0.0 kWh | 0.0 kWh | Tie |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.31 | $0.55 Best | Ebit E9.3 (16MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $9.32 | $16.50 Best | Ebit E9.3 (16MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 100 x 515 x 222 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 2500 g Best | 6900 g | Antminer R4 (8.7MH/s) |
Ebit E9.3 (16MH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Ebit E9.3 (16MH/s) has a higher hashrate of 16 MH/s compared to Antminer R4 (8.7MH/s)'s 8.7 MH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.