Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer S17 (56TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | S17 | HS3 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 56 TH/s Best | 9 TH/s | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2520W | 2079W Best | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 45.00 J/TH Best | 231.00 J/TH | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 60.5 kWh | 49.9 kWh Best | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.86 | -$1.10 Best | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$55.76 | -$33.11 Best | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 178 x 298 x 296 mm | 331 x 391 x 234 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 9500 g | 6100 g Best | Antminer HS3 (9TH/s) |
Antminer S17 (56TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer S17 (56TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer S17 (56TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 56 TH/s compared to Antminer HS3 (9TH/s)'s 9 TH/s.
Yes, Antminer S17 (56TH/s) is more energy efficient at 45.00 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.