Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.
Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.
Option 1
Option 2
Antminer S17 Pro (50TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer S17 (56TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.065/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) | Antminer S17 Pro (50TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | S17 | S17 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 56 TH/s Best | 50 TH/s | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2520W | 1975W Best | Antminer S17 Pro (50TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 45.00 J/TH | 39.50 J/TH Best | Antminer S17 Pro (50TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 60.5 kWh | 47.4 kWh Best | Antminer S17 Pro (50TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.69 | -$1.16 Best | Antminer S17 Pro (50TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$50.74 | -$34.83 Best | Antminer S17 Pro (50TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 178 x 298 x 296 mm | 178 x 298 x 296 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 9500 g | 9500 g | Tie |
Antminer S17 (56TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer S17 Pro (50TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer S17 (56TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 56 TH/s compared to Antminer S17 Pro (50TH/s)'s 50 TH/s.
Antminer S17 Pro (50TH/s) is more energy efficient at 39.50 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
