Antminer S17 (56TH/s) vs SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)
Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.
Option 1
Antminer S17 (56TH/s)
Option 2
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) leads this comparison
SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer S17 (56TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Obelisk | Contextual |
| Model | S17 | SC1 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 56 TH/s Best | 2.2 TH/s | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2520W | 1600W Best | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 45.00 J/TH Best | 727.27 J/TH | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 60.5 kWh | 38.4 kWh Best | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.86 | -$1.62 Best | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$55.76 | -$48.72 Best | SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | IMMERSION | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 178 x 298 x 296 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 9500 g | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
Antminer S17 (56TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
Antminer S17 (56TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer S17 (56TH/s) or SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)?
Antminer S17 (56TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 56 TH/s compared to SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)'s 2.2 TH/s.
Is Antminer S17 (56TH/s) more efficient than SC1 Immersion (2.2TH/s)?
Yes, Antminer S17 (56TH/s) is more energy efficient at 45.00 J/TH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.