Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Teraflux AI3680 (360MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer S17 (56TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) | Teraflux AI3680 (360MH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | S17 | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 56 TH/s Best | 360 MH/s | Antminer S17 (56TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2520W | 0W Best | Teraflux AI3680 (360MH/s) |
| Efficiency | 45.00 J/TH | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 60.5 kWh | 0.0 kWh Best | Teraflux AI3680 (360MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.86 | $13.26 Best | Teraflux AI3680 (360MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$55.76 | $397.80 Best | Teraflux AI3680 (360MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | IMMERSION | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 178 x 298 x 296 mm | N/A | Contextual |
| Weight | 9500 g | N/A | Contextual |
Antminer S17 (56TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer S17 (56TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 56 TH/s compared to Teraflux AI3680 (360MH/s)'s 360 MH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.