Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer S17 (53MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer E11 (9KH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer S17 (53MH/s) | Antminer E11 (9KH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 53 MH/s Best | 9 KH/s | Antminer S17 (53MH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 0W | 0W | Tie |
| Efficiency | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 0.0 kWh | 0.0 kWh | Tie |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.00 | $0.00 | Tie |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $0.00 | $0.00 Best | Antminer E11 (9KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 178 x 298 x 296 mm | 400 x 290 x 195 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 9500 g Best | 14200 g | Antminer S17 (53MH/s) |
Antminer S17 (53MH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer S17 (53MH/s) has a higher hashrate of 53 MH/s compared to Antminer E11 (9KH/s)'s 9 KH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.