Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer S17 (53MH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer S17 (53MH/s) | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | N/A | MicroBT | Contextual |
| Model | N/A | M50 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 53 MH/s | 128 TH/s Best | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 0W Best | 3276W | Antminer S17 (53MH/s) |
| Efficiency | N/A | 25.59 J/TH | Contextual |
| Daily energy use | 0.0 kWh Best | 78.6 kWh | Antminer S17 (53MH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | $0.00 Best | -$0.57 | Antminer S17 (53MH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | $0.00 Best | -$17.02 | Antminer S17 (53MH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $637.86 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 178 x 298 x 296 mm | 125 x 425 x 225 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 9500 g | N/A | Contextual |
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 128 TH/s compared to Antminer S17 (53MH/s)'s 53 MH/s.
Efficiency data is not available for this comparison.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.