Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer S19 (95TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer S19 (95TH/s) | Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | MicroBT | Contextual |
| Model | S19 | M10 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 95 TH/s Best | 33 TH/s | Antminer S19 (95TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 3250W | 2145W Best | Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 34.21 J/TH Best | 65.00 J/TH | Antminer S19 (95TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 78.0 kWh | 51.5 kWh Best | Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.63 Best | -$2.04 | Antminer S19 (95TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$48.90 Best | -$61.16 | Antminer S19 (95TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 195 x 400 x 290 mm | 130 x 390 x 220 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 14500 g | 8550 g Best | Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) |
Antminer S19 (95TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer S19 (95TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer S19 (95TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 95 TH/s compared to Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s)'s 33 TH/s.
Yes, Antminer S19 (95TH/s) is more energy efficient at 34.21 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.