Antminer S9 Hydro (18TH/s) vs A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s)
Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.
Option 1
Antminer S9 Hydro (18TH/s)
Option 2
A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s)
A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) leads this comparison
A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer S9 Hydro (18TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer S9 Hydro (18TH/s) | A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Innosilicon | Contextual |
| Model | S9 | A9++ | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 18 TH/s Best | 140 KH/s | Antminer S9 Hydro (18TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1728W | 1550W Best | A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) |
| Efficiency | 96.00 J/TH | 11.07 J/KH Best | A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 41.5 kWh | 37.2 kWh Best | A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.88 | $1.87 Best | A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$56.35 | $56.04 Best | A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | HYDRO | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 125 x 360 x 190 mm | 155 x 360 x 250 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 5150 g Best | 11000 g | Antminer S9 Hydro (18TH/s) |
Performance
Antminer S9 Hydro (18TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer S9 Hydro (18TH/s) or A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s)?
Antminer S9 Hydro (18TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 18 TH/s compared to A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s)'s 140 KH/s.
Is Antminer S9 Hydro (18TH/s) more efficient than A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s)?
A9++ ZMaster (140KH/s) is more energy efficient at 11.07 J/KH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.