Option 1

Option 2

Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. AL3 (15TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) | AL3 (15TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | IceRiver | Contextual |
| Model | S9 | AL | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 13.5 TH/s | 15 TH/s Best | AL3 (15TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1323W Best | 3500W | Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 98.00 J/TH Best | 233.33 J/TH | Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 31.8 kWh Best | 84.0 kWh | Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.49 Best | -$2.47 | Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$44.55 Best | -$74.10 | Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 135 x 350 x 158 mm | 370 x 290 x 195 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4200 g Best | 16000 g | Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) |
AL3 (15TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
AL3 (15TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 15 TH/s compared to Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s)'s 13.5 TH/s.
Yes, Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) is more energy efficient at 98.00 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.