Option 1

Option 2

Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) | Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Ebang | Contextual |
| Model | S9 | Ebit | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 13.5 TH/s | 13.5 TH/s | Tie |
| Power Consumption | 1323W Best | 1420W | Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 98.00 J/TH Best | 105.19 J/TH | Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 31.8 kWh Best | 34.1 kWh | Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.49 Best | -$1.62 | Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$44.55 Best | -$48.74 | Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 135 x 350 x 158 mm | 147 x 305 x 161 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4200 g Best | 5500 g | Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) |
Both miners list the same hashrate for raw output potential.
Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) and Ebit E9i (13.5TH/s) have the same listed hashrate of 13.5 TH/s.
Yes, Antminer S9 (13.5TH/s) is more energy efficient at 98.00 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.