Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer S9 (11.5TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer S9 (11.5TH/s) | Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | MicroBT | Contextual |
| Model | S9 | M10 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 11.5 TH/s | 33 TH/s Best | Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1127W Best | 2145W | Antminer S9 (11.5TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 98.00 J/TH | 65.00 J/TH Best | Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 27.0 kWh Best | 51.5 kWh | Antminer S9 (11.5TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.29 Best | -$2.13 | Antminer S9 (11.5TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$38.79 Best | -$63.86 | Antminer S9 (11.5TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 135 x 350 x 158 mm | 130 x 390 x 220 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4200 g Best | 8550 g | Antminer S9 (11.5TH/s) |
Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 33 TH/s compared to Antminer S9 (11.5TH/s)'s 11.5 TH/s.
Whatsminer M10 (33TH/s) is more energy efficient at 65.00 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.