Antminer S9 (13TH/s) vs Avalon A1566 (185TH/s)
Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.
Option 1
Antminer S9 (13TH/s)
Option 2
Avalon A1566 (185TH/s)
Avalon A1566 (185TH/s) leads this comparison
Avalon A1566 (185TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer S9 (13TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer S9 (13TH/s) | Avalon A1566 (185TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | AvalonMiner | Contextual |
| Model | S9 | A15 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 13 TH/s | 185 TH/s Best | Avalon A1566 (185TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 1300W Best | 3420W | Antminer S9 (13TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 100.00 J/TH | 18.49 J/TH Best | Avalon A1566 (185TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 31.2 kWh Best | 82.1 kWh | Antminer S9 (13TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.45 | $1.04 Best | Avalon A1566 (185TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$43.56 | $31.06 Best | Avalon A1566 (185TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 135 x 350 x 158 mm | 301 x 292 x 192 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 4200 g Best | 14900 g | Antminer S9 (13TH/s) |
Performance
Avalon A1566 (185TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
Avalon A1566 (185TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer S9 (13TH/s) or Avalon A1566 (185TH/s)?
Avalon A1566 (185TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 185 TH/s compared to Antminer S9 (13TH/s)'s 13 TH/s.
Is Antminer S9 (13TH/s) more efficient than Avalon A1566 (185TH/s)?
Avalon A1566 (185TH/s) is more energy efficient at 18.49 J/TH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.