Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

SC-BOX (900GH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer T17 (40TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer T17 (40TH/s) | SC-BOX (900GH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Goldshell | Contextual |
| Model | T17 | Goldshell | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 40 TH/s Best | 900 GH/s | Antminer T17 (40TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2200W | 200W Best | SC-BOX (900GH/s) |
| Efficiency | 55.00 J/TH | 0.22 J/GH Best | SC-BOX (900GH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 52.8 kWh | 4.8 kWh Best | SC-BOX (900GH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$1.95 | -$0.09 Best | SC-BOX (900GH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$58.44 | -$2.64 Best | SC-BOX (900GH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 298 x 296 x 178 mm | 150 x 178 x 84 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | 11500 g | 2000 g Best | SC-BOX (900GH/s) |
Antminer T17 (40TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
SC-BOX (900GH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer T17 (40TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 40 TH/s compared to SC-BOX (900GH/s)'s 900 GH/s.
SC-BOX (900GH/s) is more energy efficient at 0.22 J/GH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.