Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.


Option 1

Option 2

Antminer S17 (53TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer T17e (53TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer T17e (53TH/s) | Antminer S17 (53TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | Antminer | Contextual |
| Model | T17 | S17 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 53 TH/s | 53 TH/s | Tie |
| Power Consumption | 2915W | 2385W Best | Antminer S17 (53TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 55.00 J/TH | 45.00 J/TH Best | Antminer S17 (53TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 70.0 kWh | 57.2 kWh Best | Antminer S17 (53TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$2.50 | -$1.76 Best | Antminer S17 (53TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$74.93 | -$52.93 Best | Antminer S17 (53TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 175 x 304 x 298 mm | 178 x 298 x 296 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | 9500 g | Contextual |
Both miners list the same hashrate for raw output potential.
Antminer S17 (53TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Antminer T17e (53TH/s) and Antminer S17 (53TH/s) have the same listed hashrate of 53 TH/s.
Antminer S17 (53TH/s) is more energy efficient at 45.00 J/TH.
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.