Antminer T17e (53TH/s) vs Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s)
Compare pricing, hashrate, power draw, efficiency, ROI, and estimated hosted profitability before choosing your next mining setup.
Option 1
Antminer T17e (53TH/s)
Option 2
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s)
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) leads this comparison
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) comes out ahead on more buyer-facing signals here. Antminer T17e (53TH/s) can still be the better fit when budget, availability, or a specific mining setup matters more.
Profit estimates use currently available product data and a hosted electricity rate of $0.060/kWh.
Technical comparison
Side-by-side mining, operating, and commercial specs.
| Feature | Antminer T17e (53TH/s) | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand | Antminer | MicroBT | Contextual |
| Model | T17 | M50 | Contextual |
| Hashrate | 53 TH/s | 128 TH/s Best | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Power Consumption | 2915W Best | 3276W | Antminer T17e (53TH/s) |
| Efficiency | 55.00 J/TH | 25.59 J/TH Best | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Daily energy use | 70.0 kWh Best | 78.6 kWh | Antminer T17e (53TH/s) |
| Net Daily Profit (Est.) | -$2.50 | -$0.57 Best | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Monthly Profit (Est.) | -$74.93 | -$17.02 Best | Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) |
| Price | N/A | $637.86 | Contextual |
| Estimated ROI | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
| Cooling | AIR | AIR | Contextual |
| Dimensions | 175 x 304 x 298 mm | 125 x 425 x 225 mm | Contextual |
| Weight | N/A | N/A | Contextual |
Performance
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has the hashrate edge for raw output potential.
Efficiency
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) is stronger when comparing joules per hash unit.
Buying decision
Check live stock, delivery schedule, and hosting capacity on the product page before placing an order.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful: Antminer T17e (53TH/s) or Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s)?
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) has a higher hashrate of 128 TH/s compared to Antminer T17e (53TH/s)'s 53 TH/s.
Is Antminer T17e (53TH/s) more efficient than Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s)?
Whatsminer M50S (128TH/s) is more energy efficient at 25.59 J/TH.
Which miner has the better estimated ROI?
Estimated ROI is not available because one of the miners is missing current pricing or profit data.
Every Day You Wait is Revenue You Lose
Curious? Let’s connect to answer your questions.